If you ask a cement contractor what the best material is, they will say "Cement." If you ask a coatings rep, they will say "Epoxy."

But as an asset manager or engineer, you don’t have the luxury of brand loyalty. You have a failing infrastructure, a limited budget, and a 50-year design life to meet.

The truth is, there is no "magic bullet." The success of your rehabilitation program depends on matching the right material to the specific defect.

In this guide, we break down the three titans of the industry—Cementitious Liners, Epoxies, and Polyurethanes—to help you decide which spec belongs in your next tender.

Contender 1: Cementitious Liners (Calcium Aluminate Cements)

The Structural Workhorse:

When a manhole is structurally compromised—bricks missing, mortar gone, walls thinning—you need bulk material to rebuild the "skeleton." This is where cement shines. Note: We are talking about Calcium Aluminate Cements (CAC), not standard Portland cement, which cannot survive in sewer environments.

​

✅ The Pros:

• Structural Restoration: Can be applied 1 inch to 3 inches thick to replace lost wall integrity.
• Moisture Tolerance: It is forgiving. It can be applied to damp surfaces (which manholes always are).
• Cost: Generally the most affordable option per vertical foot.

​

❌ The Cons:

• Chemical Resistance: While better than Portland Cement, CACs still struggle in high H2S environments (pH levels below 2).
• Cure Time: Requires 24-28 days to reach full design strength, though it can accept flow sooner.
• Permeability: It is still concrete; it can eventually be permeated by liquids.

​

Best For: Severely deteriorated masonry that needs structural rebuilding before a coating is applied.

Contender 2: Epoxy Coatings

The Chemical Shield:

Epoxy is the industry standard for corrosion protection. It creates a hard, rigid, impermeable shell bonded to the substrate. If your primary problem is Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S) gas eating your concrete, Epoxy is the shield.

​

✅ The Pros:

• Chemical Immunity: High-quality epoxies can withstand pH ranges from 1 to 14.
• Adhesion: Forms a monolithic bond to the substrate (if prepped correctly).
• Strength: Adds significant structural enhancement despite being a thin layer (typically 125-250 mils).

​

❌ The Cons:

• Surface Prep is Critical: The substrate must be perfectly clean and dry (or surface-dry). If the prep is bad, the liner fails.
• Brittleness: Epoxy is rigid. If the manhole shifts due to freeze/thaw or traffic, the coating can crack.
• Cure Time: Longer return-to-service time than Polyurethane (often 4-24 hours).

​

Best For: High-corrosion environments (force main discharges) and assets where maximizing lifespan is the priority.

Contender 3: Polyurethane (PU)

The Speed Demon:

Polyurethanes and Polyureas are the sprinters of the group. They are spray-applied flexible coatings that cure in seconds or minutes.

​

✅ The Pros:

• Speed: Cure time is instant (seconds to minutes). You can spray a manhole and open the road to traffic in the same hour.
• Flexibility: Elongation properties allow it to "stretch" with the manhole during traffic vibration or thermal expansion without cracking.
• Thickness: Can be built up quickly to any thickness.

​

❌ The Cons:

• Moisture Sensitivity: If water touches the resin during application, it foams and fails. Active leaks must be stopped completely first.
• Cost: Generally higher material cost than cement.
• Equipment: Requires sophisticated, heated plural-component spray rigs.

​

Best For: Emergency repairs, high-traffic areas where road closure time is limited, and structures subject to movement/vibration.